🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he has objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in other EU countries